Ya I think they get kick backs you show them someone on there that has no authorities and yet they are still allowed to post or take loads but yet maybe Loadlink should be liable for any incidents that happen with their customers I mean they all should be legit no ?They think they know what they doing but cant even police their own board for false postings or information
Interesting. Based on the recent judgement against CH Robinson, I wonder if Loadlink could be dragged into a lawsuit if the carrier was sourced from a posting but proven to have no authorities, etc. LL claims to have robust vetting and they touted their own dog and pony show to help us spot the fraudsters but lets face it - the majority of us on here could have taught that seminar.Ya I think they get kick backs you show them someone on there that has no authorities and yet they are still allowed to post or take loads but yet maybe Loadlink should be liable for any incidents that happen with their customers I mean they all should be legit no ?
In spite of their assurances to the contrary, LL cannot guarantee or ensure that criminals won’t infiltrate their platform. Unfortunately, there are some folks who mistakenly believe that subscribing to LL will provide some level of protection against falling victim to the bad actors. It cannot be emphasized enough, that the responsibility for ensuring you won’t get scammed rests squarely on your own shoulders and no one else’s.You can argue the value but there are lanes that come up that it is good to have options. We would hope LL would have a decent vetting process but at the end of the day it is caveat emptor, do your own due diligence. In comparison to DAT in the US it is a ton better.
What a jokeThey think they know what they doing but cant even police their own board for false postings or information
This is why loadlink monopolizes the industry, and we allow itAlways wonder how many transport companies and load brokers rely heavily on Load link as their key source for getting loads and selling loads.
So if they're drowning stick a hose in their mouth and speed it along.they need to clean up their act as there are other load boards gaining ground
Broker - "I see you have a truck in NB today?"If they cleared the board every day at 12:00 AM and didn't allow templates, every post would be freshly inputted in the AM during one's 'morning coffee'.
Of course, templates and posting carry over is a 'feature' they can charge for...
Just sayin'
Mike
Them there is facts Fr8Guru.Broker - "I see you have a truck in NB today?"
Carrier - "sorry auto post next truck is next week"
Broker - "oh well I have loads all next week, gives details."
Carrier - "sorry booked up"
Loadlink 101 right there
thanks for the leadSo if they're drowning stick a hose in their mouth and speed it along.
Cargado is not too bad so far.
So true Mike. It’s sad to say, but there are lazy carriers and lazy brokers out there who post non existent trucks and non existent loads. Carriers “just looking” to see what’s out there and what it pays in that particular neighborhood just in case they end up there at some time in the future. Brokers posting phantom loads to gauge what the “going rate” is for trucks out of a particular region. Combine that with carry over posts from days gone by and one has to wonder….” How many actual trucks and how many real loads are there.”If they cleared the board every day at 12:00 AM and didn't allow templates, every post would be freshly inputted in the AM during one's 'morning coffee'.
Of course, templates and posting carry over is a 'feature' they can charge for...
Just sayin'
Mike