Kommitted Transportation Inc out of Laval Quebec

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good. Glad to hear you have maintained your customer. In the long run, that is the most important thing. I guess the only question I have is, was the company who actually hauled the freight finally paid? It has been my experience that once payment has been made and received, the party complaining about non payment usually stops. It appears, or at least I think it does, that isn’t the case here. Care to elaborate?
Have to chime in - reading between the lines
Jace got paid USD6000
somehow the CAD5200 for the extra load that was unpaid previouly probably got reversed and that is the issue
 
  • Like
Reactions: loaders
Have to chime in - reading between the lines
Jace got paid USD6000
somehow the CAD5200 for the extra load that was unpaid previouly probably got reversed and that is the issue
Who really knows. I mean, the guy who owes the money fervently claims he has paid it, yet the guy who is owed the money just as emphatically says he hasn’t received it. Why is that? How could that be? Again, yet another example of the shit show that results from double/triple/co-brokering. Way too many chefs in the kitchen and way too many things to go wrong.
 
Last edited:
This entire back-and-forth argument seems to be about this payment reversal which is going over Mikes head, why don't you contact your bank and see what's going on? Wires dont get reversed by themself. This entire shitshow would be over if you two would get that sorted out. A carrier has no reason to harass you if they have been paid in full. The whole name-calling is entirely unprofessional and isn't getting you anywhere other than to entertain the forum members. This is a great opportunity to amend your problems before this thread gets closed by the admin for all this nonsense.
 
This entire back-and-forth argument seems to be about this payment reversal which is going over Mikes head, why don't you contact your bank and see what's going on? Wires dont get reversed by themself. This entire shitshow would be over if you two would get that sorted out. A carrier has no reason to harass you if they have been paid in full. The whole name-calling is entirely unprofessional and isn't getting you anywhere other than to entertain the forum members. This is a great opportunity to amend your problems before this thread gets closed by the admin for all this nonsense.
You're right, it's gone completely over my head. I've missed reading this full thread where he said we've reversed payment.

There has been no payment reversal. He can scream to the hills that we still owe him money, we do not.
 
Anyone else deeply curious about the screen shot showing the 5200 reversal with matching transaction ids? Be nice to see a statement from the senders account showing that it wasn't reversed imho.

In my many years in this industry, I've seen doctored WSIB/WCB, doctored insurance, doctored authorities... but I can't remember seeing a doctored bank transactional statement..., I guess its possible if someone wanted to head down the road of forgery/fraud etc.
 
You're right, it's gone completely over my head. I've missed reading this full thread where he said we've reversed payment.

There has been no payment reversal. He can scream to the hills that we still owe him money, we do not.

He's posted a bank statement like 3 times, so maybe something to look into, and no offense but if Dave or Danny took a load from Power Pivot, he isn't bright enough to doctor a bank statement. SO yes I still stand on the fact this has completely gone over your head.

All I'm saying is you aren't doing a very great job of "defending" yourself if you can't provide proof against the only allegation that's put against you. Why don't you provide proof that this hasn't been reversed, seems like a simple enough task, or is it easier to argue on Inside transport saying the same thing over and over?

You guys seem like a decent firm that got caught up or put yourself into a bit of a mess, and it happens to the best of us but whatever is happening in this thread isn't a good look for either business.
 
Anyone else deeply curious about the screen shot showing the 5200 reversal with matching transaction ids? Be nice to see a statement from the senders account showing that it wasn't reversed imho.

In my many years in this industry, I've seen doctored WSIB/WCB, doctored insurance, doctored authorities... but I can't remember seeing a doctored bank transactional statement..., I guess its possible if someone wanted to head down the road of forgery/fraud etc.
I've never seen a doctored transaction either, however, I've also never seen a reversal like that either.

Mind you, I've heard its possible on e-transfers, not sure on ACH.

At the end of the day - One guy is showing us a reversed transaction and the other is adamantly saying it was never reversed but offering no proof.
 
He's posted a bank statement like 3 times, so maybe something to look into, and no offense but if Dave or Danny took a load from Power Pivot, he isn't bright enough to doctor a bank statement. SO yes I still stand on the fact this has completely gone over your head.

All I'm saying is you aren't doing a very great job of "defending" yourself if you can't provide proof against the only allegation that's put against you. Why don't you provide proof that this hasn't been reversed, seems like a simple enough task, or is it easier to argue on Inside transport saying the same thing over and over?

You guys seem like a decent firm that got caught up or put yourself into a bit of a mess, and it happens to the best of us but whatever is happening in this thread isn't a good look for either business.
Just saw this thread, I don't want to sound like biased but i looked at the screenshot and it clearly states the whole amount was reversed through Danny or Dave bank. His English isn't the best but it seems like Mike is playing double game here took the money back and now is implying that he is the most honest guy in this world.

In order to see more on this and I called my bank manager as i work a lot with him and he said unfortunately transaction can be reversed if the sender claims it as fraud. So seems like Mike is not so honest as he claims and did something sketchy. I request the moderator of this chat to change the thread and this doesn't seem fair he made his decision without even Mike providing any proof.

Mike where is your proof? you seem like a good company but look at your google reviews there is other companies saying same thing that you dont pay, what you have to say about that ?
 
Who really knows. I mean, the guy who owes the money fervently claims he has paid it, yet the guy who is owed the money just as emphatically says he hasn’t received it. Why is that? How could that be? Again, yet another example of the shit show that results from double/triple/co-brokering. Way too many chefs in the kitchen and way too many things to go wrong.

Being a carrier I know there is a lot of brokers taking there hard earned money and making quick bucks. FYI look at the google ratings of Kommited Transport seems like Danny or Dave is not the only one putting claims on HONEST MIKE Lol. We dont work with any new brokers with our due diligence and Mike for sure is on our DNU as he seems to speak more and have no proofs.

Mike triple brokered his load imagine if something goes wrong on the shipment who would be responsible for the insurance as PIVOT seems to not even exsisit. Triple brokering load because you are paying cheap on loads isnt a good sign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave J
So I've got a luncheon to host with 40 or so local business owners so I've not much time to police this thread until later today. I've not read every post above but have a couple of things to add.
Mike is not my Dad.
Mike, I'd like very much to hear about the $5200 reversal, it puts into question your paying the carrier for services rendered.

Keep well,
Mike
 
So I've got a luncheon to host with 40 or so local business owners so I've not much time to police this thread until later today. I've not read every post above but have a couple of things to add.
Mike is not my Dad.
Mike, I'd like very much to hear about the $5200 reversal, it puts into question your paying the carrier for services rendered.

Keep well,
Mike
I've called my accounting team in Laval, they are sending me screen shots of our bank statement from March 5th - March 8th covering a day on each side of the transaction in question. Will be posting here so we can all clear this up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EricG
I've called my accounting team in Laval, they are sending me screen shots of our bank statement from March 5th - March 8th covering a day on each side of the transaction in question. Will be posting here so we can all clear this up.
I am tired of your lies, almost all members have seen your lies by now.

I am attaching an email from rbc, hiding names cause I don't want to show people working with me on this case but you can see domain from where emails are coming from @rbc.com. This email will show your lies clearly, I request everyone to stand with what is right and expose this Mike.

All I want is my heard earned money to be paid to me and you are trying to be really over smart with your lies lies and lies. Request for moderator to change the listing title as i have shown two proofs against this guy now.
 

Attachments

  • Email.png
    Email.png
    140.9 KB · Views: 54
  • Like
Reactions: MLCAR and Stylez
He's posted a bank statement like 3 times, so maybe something to look into, and no offense but if Dave or Danny took a load from Power Pivot, he isn't bright enough to doctor a bank statement. SO yes I still stand on the fact this has completely gone over your head.

All I'm saying is you aren't doing a very great job of "defending" yourself if you can't provide proof against the only allegation that's put against you. Why don't you provide proof that this hasn't been reversed, seems like a simple enough task, or is it easier to argue on Inside transport saying the same thing over and over?

You guys seem like a decent firm that got caught up or put yourself into a bit of a mess, and it happens to the best of us but whatever is happening in this thread isn't a good look for either business.
Thanks for supporting all i want is my hard earned money to be paid
 
So I've got a luncheon to host with 40 or so local business owners so I've not much time to police this thread until later today. I've not read every post above but have a couple of things to add.
Mike is not my Dad.
Mike, I'd like very much to hear about the $5200 reversal, it puts into question your paying the carrier for services rendered.

Keep well,
Mike
I request you i have shown two proofs please revert title as this mike isnt paying me and several other carriers if you look at his google reviews.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stylez
all is correct except for the payment reversal. We wired the $5200 in question, the money hit his account. I don’t even know if you can reverse a wire once it’s already in recipients account.
Also knowing that he has our customers contact details and has reached out already, we would not risk reversing a payment because he would of course go back to the customer.

His story doesn’t add up that payment was reversed.
 

Attachments

  • Email.png
    Email.png
    140.9 KB · Views: 42
Last edited:
I am tired of your lies, almost all members have seen your lies by now.

I am attaching an email from rbc, hiding names cause I don't want to show people working with me on this case but you can see domain from where emails are coming from @rbc.com. This email will show your lies clearly, I request everyone to stand with what is right and expose this Mike.

All I want is my heard earned money to be paid to me and you are trying to be really over smart with your lies lies and lies. Request for moderator to change the listing title as i have shown two proofs against this guy now.
@mikes just pay this guy, I don't think its worth ruining your company reputation for couple grand. I don't think you can provide any proof after he has shared this email.

No one can doctorate an email with the same transaction dates and times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.