i don't care if i am on your DNU list, i don't want to work with you either in future because you betrayed me just clear the invoice and we both will be our way !
Kommitted Transportation Inc out of Laval Quebec
- Thread starter Dave J
- Start date
- Status
30
Definitely an odd one.
From what I'm getting from this thread and please do correct me if I'm wrong
- Kommitted tenders load to a entity (BM) who double brokers it to Power Pivot , who triple brokers it to the actual carrier Jace in our case.
- Jace holds load hostage as its passed through many hands and does not know if they will get paid.
- Jace contacts Kommitteds shipper to get payment.
- Kommitted pays the invoice to get the shipment offloaded.
- Kommitted reverses payment once offloaded.
- Jace goes back to the shipper.
- now we are exchanging all of our nasty feelings on inside transport.
5
all is correct except for the payment reversal. We wired the $5200 in question, the money hit his account. I don’t even know if you can reverse a wire once it’s already in recipients account.
Also knowing that he has our customers contact details and has reached out already, we would not risk reversing a payment because he would of course go back to the customer.
His story doesn’t add up that payment was reversed.
Mike Jr.
how can you change delete and change tread to Honorable company without investigating actual problem
you are member of inside transport, look like you know each other
are you part of this scam ?
what you say about this reversed payment
see below proof
LrgCar
Kommitted shouldn't be reversing the payment once done, this illegal, if payment cleared we then we don't have any problem we both will be our way
based on the grammatical errors I assume neither party is Mike or Dave.
5
My name is Mike Schummer. That is my real name and my cell phone was posted above as well. Feel free to contact me if you want mike@kommittedtrans.com / 519 983 7211
30
Wow, what a circle jerk..Be careful..tell your shipper who is picking up your load, and if someone else shows up don't load it! Problem solved.
30
Really, the only thing remotely positive about this entire thread, is the opportunity we all have to place these 2 companies on our DNU list. Regardless of who is at fault, this back and forth name calling speaks volumes about the companies involved, and none of it is good. Time to shut this cluster f*** down.
Last edited:
30
5
You’re going to put us on DNU for standing up for myself? If I didn’t respond to this thread the whole community would assume Dave is correct with what he’s saying.
Surely if someone came on here talking about your company, you would also have something to say about it. But go ahead loaders.
30
There is way too much conflicting information on this thread. Payments made, pavements reversed. The same load given to one carrier, then another, then another. The shipper contacted when payment was already made. And that is just the small amount of info I was able to decipher from all this nonsense. At this point I don’t think anyone can tell who is telling the truth and who is telling stories. The moral of this story…….don’t double broker your own freight, and don’t allow anyone else to either.
When you want to make a quick buck - the quick buck usually makes you.
5
@loaders I understand, there's not enough info for a third party to make a sound decision on who's telling the truth here. We certainly did not intend for our shipment to be double/triple brokered and end up like this. Our vetting process should have been more strict, there is no doubt about that. There's a hundred excuses we could give you on the day of pickup as to why we booked this with BM and it ended the way it did. At the end of the day, our customer is still moving freight with us, we've been a solid provider for them for years, and after this situation they trust us to take on more freight from them because of how we dealt with this situation. It's no sweat off my back at the end of the day - i'm simply standing up for myself about accusations that we are scammers, when we are not.
@artmax This was never about a quick buck. Last second emergency shipment that had to go same day, open deck shipment from FL-AB, capacity isn't the greatest when in a pinch. We provided an option when it came up, it slipped through. We have dedicated carriers on this lane that we move 12 times per week. We have $4800 USD on these shipments and Danny said he needed $6000 USD because that's what Power Pivot tendered to them. We paid them $6000 USD and took that hit because we are solid for our customer. This isn't about a quick buck, this is about a long term relationship that's still intact.
@artmax This was never about a quick buck. Last second emergency shipment that had to go same day, open deck shipment from FL-AB, capacity isn't the greatest when in a pinch. We provided an option when it came up, it slipped through. We have dedicated carriers on this lane that we move 12 times per week. We have $4800 USD on these shipments and Danny said he needed $6000 USD because that's what Power Pivot tendered to them. We paid them $6000 USD and took that hit because we are solid for our customer. This isn't about a quick buck, this is about a long term relationship that's still intact.
30
Good. Glad to hear you have maintained your customer. In the long run, that is the most important thing. I guess the only question I have is, was the company who actually hauled the freight finally paid? It has been my experience that once payment has been made and received, the party complaining about non payment usually stops. It appears, or at least I think it does, that isn’t the case here. Care to elaborate?
5
Jace Trucklines has been paid in full. They received a $3000 USD etransfer, then another $3000 USD etransfer, and then a $5200 CAD wire transfer. I have absolutely no issue showing anybody the remittance if you want to pm me your email. I have nothing to hide.
30
Perhaps the lesson to us watching this back & forth.
*Don't lower your standards to gain capacity*
*Don't lower your standards to gain capacity*
5
- Status