did all go well with this one @Jim L ? we have a move for them.Can I get an update on this company? We are moving a load for them today.
Apologies - looking back it was "Hans Truckline"I've used them a few times as well, back in February of this year - picked up and delivered on time.
Would use again
Outstanding at 41 days as of today. No payment yetdid all go well with this one @Jim L ? we have a move for them.
If this is the case, then I can say from as far as service goes as a carrier (pertaining to the aforementioned Hans Truckline), everything went as scheduled, no issues!Hi Team,
Its Jas from Hans Transport any issue with payment please do reach out to me directly info@hanstransport.ca and we are running a bit behind at the moment and pay at 60 days but doing it weekly are are free to pick up checks at our office in Norval (Georgetown) and Hans Truckline is also just a corporation we opened but never got a chance to put anything trucks under hope this clears up things and happy trucking!
I don’t think I am alone on this issue but it disturbs me to see yet another example of a “carrier” occasionally assuming the role of a “broker”. Don’t get me wrong, I fully understand and appreciate that many asset based carriers have separate and properly registered brokerage divisions. Those aren’t (I hope) the problem. It is the ones who appear regularly on this site wearing both hats. Making matters worse is when they are tardy payers while acting as a broker. If I sell one of my customers loads to a “carrier”, I fully expect that carrier to perform the transportation. If they can’t, for whatever reason, then I also expect them to advise me of the problem so that together we can find a solution, not just assign my load to whomever they can place it with. This little rant is in no way directed to Hans Transport. They just appear to be another example of this dual role some carriers assume.