Transport Loumar

Aug 19, 2011
274
0
16
London, more or less
10
Transport Loumar
St-Joseph-du-lac QC

Invoice at 100 days, very rude, said it was mailed out after we called two weeks ago, but could not provide chq# or mail date.

They get to end of week, then call to Link and shipper.

Any one else have experiences with these quacks?
 
I have an invoice dated Sept 10/ 2013 Louis says the Quebec Gov't fined him $165,000.00 log book violation ( NOT MY PROBLEM). Constant calls to him get nowhere, even called the company he got load thru, and was told he had been paid and they weren't paying twice. I'm small company and I can't afford this. I want my money did the job now pay. I ve read on here some place about the B/L act but when I read fine print on back of my B/L nothing is mentioned as to liability. Any helpful hints?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have an invoice dated Sept 10/ 2013 Louis says the Quebec Gov't fined him $165,000.00 log book violation ( NOT MY PROBLEM). Constant calls to him get nowhere, even called the company he got load thru, and was told he had been paid and they weren't paying twice. I'm small company and I can't afford this. I want my money did the job now pay. I ve read on here some place about the B/L act but when I read fine print on back of my B/L nothing is mentioned as to liability. Any helpful hints?


here is one of them search box is up in top right
http://insidetransport.com/index.ph...ng-act-case-precedence-help.13803/#post-43071
 
rickwill, if you want some expert advice, send a PM to Scamchaser on this forum. This kind of thing is right up his alley!
 
Rickwill,

If you'd like to PM me your email address I'll forward you a letter template that includes all the jargon you are looking for (I think it was previously posted on this site but I've made some minor edits).

Happy Thursday (feels like a Friday),
Mike
 
I have an invoice dated Sept 10/ 2013 Louis says the Quebec Gov't fined him $165,000.00 log book violation ( NOT MY PROBLEM). Constant calls to him get nowhere, even called the company he got load thru, and was told he had been paid and they weren't paying twice. I'm small company and I can't afford this. I want my money did the job now pay. I ve read on here some place about the B/L act but when I read fine print on back of my B/L nothing is mentioned as to liability. Any helpful hints?

Also, in this case you mentioned to me in a PM that payment has been tendered to a factoring company but that they are avoiding paying you.

Get the factoring company involved if you can. They should know what their client is up to (double brokering, collecting and not paying you the carrier). Perhaps you can prevent them a huge issue in the future and perhaps they will help you resolve your situation.

I suppose this may be overly optimistic.

Good luck!
Mike
 
Transport Loumar
St-Joseph-du-Lac

****WARNING DO NOT USE WILL DOUBLE AND TRIPLE BROKE**** Louis Coulombe and Caroline Ducharme are SCAMMERS and will say anything to get your load they will modify papers and may make you lose your customers. They don't pay what they owe and they lie like they breathe! ****WARNING DO NOT USE****
 
They will promise to look into it, say they will call you back but never will, then claim they issued the payment, but they will leave you hanging. You should still try calling and emailing and calling and emailing:

Here is some info they may help you.

Transport Loumar Inc: Louis Coulombe - louiscoulombe@loumartr.com Tel: 514-809-3087 - Fax: 450-988-1216 - 1912, Chemin Principal, Saint-Joseph-du-lac, QC, J0N 1M0.

Call the shipper or consignee for your money…
Is it true their bank has been- inundated with NSF cheques?

If they do not pay the very smallest of invoices, can you image what they do with the large balance over $1K?

If it was a bad cheque, you received the police in QC may be interested in laying a false pretense criminal charge especially if there is a past and or regular habit of writing bad cheques by the offender.

It is a criminal offence to knowingly write out a cheque without having any funds in your account.

You can file criminal charge of false pretense against someone who has written you a bad cheque. False pretense is a misrepresentation of a fact, whether made by words or otherwise, with intent to have you act on the misrepresentation. When someone writes you a cheque, you assume the cheque is funded or the person who wrote the cheque has the capacity to pay you. If it turns out the cheque writer intentionally deceived you, you can file a false pretense case against that person. Anyone found guilty of the offense faces a prison term of up to 10 years.

At the end of the day if a court finds an individual or a corporation to be guiltily of this or any other crime the victim(s) can request that the court impose a restitution order compelling the guilty to repay the victim(s).

This is not extinguishable under a personal or corporate bankruptcy.

362. False pretence or false statement


362. (1) Every one commits an offence who
(a) by a false pretence, whether directly or through the medium of a contract obtained by a false pretence, obtains anything in respect of which the offence of theft may be committed or causes it to be delivered to another person;
(b) obtains credit by a false pretence or by fraud;
(c) knowingly makes or causes to be made, directly or indirectly, a false statement in writing with intent that it should be relied on, with respect to the financial condition or means or ability to pay of himself or herself or any person or organization that he or she is interested in or that he or she acts for, for the purpose of procuring, in any form whatever, whether for his or her benefit or the benefit of that person or organization,
(i) the delivery of personal property,
(ii) the payment of money,
(iii) the making of a loan,
(iv) the grant or extension of credit,
(v) the discount of an account receivable, or
(vi) the making, accepting, discounting or endorsing of a bill of exchange, cheque, draft or promissory note; or
(d) knowing that a false statement in writing has been made with respect to the financial condition or means or ability to pay of himself or herself or another person or organization that he or she is interested in or that he or she acts for, procures on the faith of that statement, whether for his or her benefit or for the benefit of that person or organization, anything mentioned in subparagraphs (c)(i) to (vi).
Punishment

(2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a)
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding ten years, where the property obtained is a testamentary instrument or the value of what is obtained exceeds five thousand dollars; or
(b) is guilty
(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,
where the value of what is obtained does not exceed five thousand dollars.
Idem

(3) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(b), (c) or (d) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.
Presumption from cheque issued without funds

(4) Where, in proceedings under paragraph (1)(a), it is shown that anything was obtained by the accused by means of a cheque that, when presented for payment within a reasonable time, was dishonoured on the ground that no funds or insufficient funds were on deposit to the credit of the accused in the bank or other institution on which the cheque was drawn, it shall be presumed to have been obtained by a false pretence, unless the court is satisfied by evidence that when the accused issued the cheque he believed on reasonable grounds that it would be honoured if presented for payment within a reasonable time after it was issued.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlainGrisé
******BEWARE TRANSPORT LOUMAR HAVE CHANGED NAME THEY ARE NOW OPERATING ON A QUEBEC INC. NUMBER COMPANY******** DO NOT GIVE FREIGHT TO THESE PEOPLE THEY ARE CROOKS ****** THEY STOLE OVER 80000$ FROM US AND THEY STILL SAAY THAT THEY HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG******
 
Merci pour l'information Alain.

Are you able to offer any more detail than this? I ask because both of your posts (and your only 2 posts) are in reference to this company and neither of them have any details about your actual situation.

$80 000 is quite the a/r balance that you allowed this company to have with or without checking on their credit.
Who were the references?
Are they related companies, are they part of the alleged scam?
Have you had any success in contacting the shipper/consignee, are they part of the alleged scam?

Please do try and offer our members here as many details as you can (while keeping what you need confidential to protect your business of course). Maybe someone here can help you if we had a better idea of what you are going through.

I hope this works out for you!

Keep well,
Mike
 
We were associates hense the same company and we paid the bills but he collected the money and left us dry. We are in process with a lawyer at the moment. That sums it up.