DRC,
With all due respect I'm scratching my head. I will stand behind a victimized trucker 200%. What difference does it make if I'm a member of the link or not my customers are the link members who are getting stung. Of course the link is not in favor of me because I'm pushing them to be loyal to their customers which in a lot of cases they are NOT. Many truckers have said this to me and I've seen it with my own eyes, the link prefers to look the other way. Such as the Kingston, GHK deal I pointed out. It was a obvious mockery, it was quickly ID that Tony under another name was still eating off of the site and it was further insult the link looked the other way. What were they thinking, what's the Load Link logic here?. We don't have enough Load Link complaints in place against GHK to figure out Tony is a "Baddie" please?! Again it's about weeding the bad guys out quickly to prevent their pollution from growing. I get a lot of positive feed back in the trucking industry they appreciate having knowledge about, as Mike, Jr. puts it the Baddies. I'll tell you whats sickening the link has knowledge that some guy is ripping a company off by $1,000.00's & $1,000.00's of dollars, in return the Load Link exercises their index finger presses a button, you then receive the same letter, "We acknowledge your claim at this point we need to monitor this customer". In the mean time they still eat off of the link and take the attitude they get a free pass if the link doesn't care why should the scum bag broker/ trucker care if the trucker gets paid or not. That's the last signal you want to give these no good for nothings.
As far as my posting's tell me specify what is wrong with it and please don't send me an ethic or moral response elaborate "What's makes you so tired of it"? For example first posting Beware Routex is being chased for outstanding freight bills. Second posting Routex has multiple claims pending at the Load Link it's ultimatum time, right Load Link? What is wrong with this, please explain. By the way I don't post daily. You're throwing illusion into your argument which is uncalled for.
As far as collections and being creative I promise you it's an absolute given. I know how to work the format worst case scenario just as good as you
I have a difficult time processing as to why someone would become tired of my posting's. If I was a victimized trucker I would want to know there are multiple claims pending against a nonpayer with the Load Link or anyone else especially when that seems to be the only time the link steps up to the plate.
Here's another fold with respect to Routex according to the link site before I got involved they showed Routex having no surety bond which is inaccurate. They've had a bond in place since 1993 granted it's $10,000.00 which is not much, there's multiple claims pending but the point is the links record were not accurate thanks to me that was included in my customers complaint lodge. Whether the link adjusted their records I don't know but call me one sided all the customers want done is for the link to step up to the plate and it ultimatum time for Routex. I also pointed out to the link and this is another bad sign, it eliminates all hope that Routex can change to have better business methods. We in form the link that per the bond company Andy Sabo has been dodging the bond company representative for 2 weeks.
Sincerely,
Tom Lebarron
