5
I think increasing owner/operators may have any of these 3 OR all of these reasons.If you are thinking what I am thinking, we might be on to something here! Switching to 100% o/o's..... What could possibly go wrong!
1. If Pride is successful in saving Logistics part somehow ...their lenders will still want their equipment back So owner-operators with their own trucks are better option to continue.
2. With owner-operators ...usually payables get deferred more compared to own truck.
3. Pride brokerd alot of loads and Some (maybe more than some) carriers refused taking them ...they offered Cash on delivery..some carriers still refused) / They replaced carriers by owner/operators ..to keep that Big client happy
Share if any others you can think of?
In case there is an abrupt shutdown of Logistics ..O/Os will have more to loose then drivers. One think they have done well so far is they have kept payroll on time ...and Drivers and O/Os are generally happy .....so hopefully its kept that way and Logistics gets taken over by someone as is to keep the jobs of drivers and owner operators.