Parts availability

Seems to work backwards for me.

I think Peterbilt is by far the best bet for my money.

Being a small carrier I cannot afford to have a truck down for a long time. We have three tractors in our fleet and there are 5 drivers on the trucks, hence the tractors very seldom stop. We do LTL and not FTL so therefore time is precious.
So far our best tractor is a Peterbilt that we bought used in 2002. It is a 379 with a 435 Electronic Cat. The only thing changed so far is a transmission we put in a rebuilt 13 speed back in 2004.
The differentials and the motor have never been touched by us (they must have been rebuilt previously). The tractor averages over 2.7 km/l which is quite respectable. The odometer is reaching 3,000,000 kms.
We do carry out oil changes every 25,000 kms religiously with a gallon of Lucas added at every oil change.
The 379 is a little hard to work with and not as comfortable as some, but it is very easy to work on, the complete engine is exposed once the hood is open, making a dream to work on and service.

Our other two trucks are Freightliners and they are the worst pieces of garbage on the road. Very hard to work on, it seems the engineers purposely make dissembling things difficult requiring a bevy of special tools.
Just paid both off and already changed an engine in one and will have to do an inframe on the second. Neither has reached a million miles. Lots of warranty work carried out with always a subsatntial balance not covered. We actually lost the 1st truck for 8 weeks while it was only two years old. This while Freightliner tried to figure out what was wrong. It almost bankrupted us.!!!

The big difference for a little guy like us is that when the Pete has an issue it can usually be reapaired quickly at a dealer in the USA, they usually stock parts that require replacement. ( the model has been around very long and tweaked to weed out problems).

The Freightliners are more of a problem simply because more of them are out there. I guess Mr Schneider owns 15 thousand units himself. When you break down you are almost guaranteed a wait at the dealer, sometimes for days before a simple repair can be carried out.

We also have an account with Penske allowing us to rent anywhere in the USA in case of a breakdown.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is so unique about a rad, a rads a rad. Rebuild the one you have or go to a rad shop where they have many in stock. My rad last year was $1600.00 and in and out in 3 hrs. in Mississauga at a rad shop (would have been cheaper but mine was rotten at the bottom so he picked one off the shelf). A dealer that will only go to a rad shop to get you a rad and then add a 10% charge. What might be unique is the place they only deal with didn't have any in stock. A rad will go in all makes of trucks. If you leave your truck in the hands of the dealer and just say call me when it's ready your gonna get hosed. Oh and the driver should get off his ass and help you. No miles = no money for him. Too many drivers nowadays have no clue. They're right there your mile's away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well.....as long as we're in rant mode here:

I completely agree with those voicing that Freightliners are garbage. We own a fleet of 35 Centuries. Water leaks seem to be one of our biggest problems, and it isn't the water itself, it's the salt off the roads that gets carried with the water. Therefore wiring issues seem to be ongoing, ranging from power back-feeds causing the truck not to shut off, interior electronics not functioning, ABS controller not working, the list goes on. The truck is not even close to being water tight, even when they're new, heck, they don't even have any insulation in the door skins or the bunk. And don't even get me started on the cheap plastic dash that cracks and falls apart after 200k.

Freightliners motto apparently is "lets make it cheaper and cheaper", not the traditional "lets make it better and better".

Why did they ever give up on the Huck-riveted FLD to go to a glued together Century/Columbia? Because it was cheaper!

My biggest gripe with most truck manufacturers these days is their constant commitment to changing the design of their trucks. To whose benefit is this exactly?
It isn't the end consumer who stocks parts and learns the ins and outs of one model, only for it to be completely redesigned 4 years down the road. Then he has to stock a separate set of parts and begin to understand the new truck all over again. The main goal of most fleets I believe is to keep costs down?
 
We ended up getting a rad customised at a rad shop. But try getting the TCU scanned in Labrador:confused: especially as it has a Meritor tranny. This is actually a Pete 385 tractor, stretched into a tandem straight, it has PM coming out of it's ying yang.... still rubbish to get fixed:(