Sent: March 30, 2017 4:02 PM
To: mjbinc38@aol.com
Subject: Re: MATRIX TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS
Correct. The claim should be against entropex, not against the carrier.
"The bedrock rule of carriage cases is that , absence malfeasance, the carrier gets paid
_____________________________
From:
mjbinc38@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: MATRIX TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS
Tony,
You were the carrier, please check with your attorney. ICC Trucking & Logistic Laws.
Collecting and Handling Past Due Receivables anywhere in the World!!
Sincerely,
Mark J. Bienstock
Federal Recovery Group, Inc.
38 Fordham Street
Valley Stream, New York 11581
516-524-8299- Direct Line
516-792-2842- Office
This message contains confidential information, intended only for the person(s) named above, which may also be privileged. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. In such case, you should delete this message and kindly notify the sender via reply e-mail. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
This is an attempt to collect a debt and all information obtained will be used for that sole purpose.
Mark Bienstock
Federal Recovery Group,Inc.
-----
To: mjbinc38 <
mjbinc38@aol.com>; Dispatch <
dispatch@flashfreight.ca>
Sent: Thu, Mar 30, 2017 3:26 pm
Subject: RE: MATRIX TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS
We were neither the shipper nor the consignee on these shipments. As such, it appears that we are not a related party to your claim against Entropex.