Kingston Transport/GHK - Tony

What is RBA doing about all of this? Surely, they have to step in and help stop this madness. If Tony "doesn't have money", RBA definitely does. I think if one can demonstrate that they were the carrier, not GHK, then RBA should be the one to pay since it's clear that Tony likes to factor.
 
Kingston

As per previous notes, you need to get your facts straight. First of all,Tony was with RBA and they charged these invoices back. Therefore Tony is entitled to collect debts due. Geroge Brown is collecting only the good debts. I would advise if you receive a letter, please do contact Geroge and get this resolved. George Brown is allowing 72 hours for anyone to resolve their matters, with debts that are due. I would advise, that you take this opportunity and take advantage to clear any matters outstanding. Those who got letters, know his number.
 
In response to the previous posts about the Kingston and GHK Collections. It is correct that Kingston and GHK's accounts have been assigned to my firm for collection and/or litigation.

For those who are incorrectly listed on either company's accounts receivable, this is your opportunity to resolve this issue once and for all. My firm operates with the confinement of the Rule of Law. Having stated this. I will not pursue any company that does not legitimately owe the companies previously mentioned.

However, I intend to pursue any company who owes Kingston and GHK but refuses to tender payment. I am a proponent of the fact that truckers are hard working people who deserve to be paid for their services Kingston and GHK included. There are numerous companies who accept trust monies and have failed and/or neglected to discharge their trust obligations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In response to the previous posts about the Kingston and GHK Collections. It is correct that Kingston and GHK's accounts have been assigned to my firm for collection and/or litigation. For those who are incorrectly listed on either company's accounts receivable, this is your opportunity to resolve this issue once and for all. My firm operates with the confinement of the Rule of Law. Having stated this. I will not purse any company that does not legitimately owe the companies previously mentioned; however, I intend to purse any company who owes Kingston and GHK but refuses to tender payment. I am a proponent of the fact that truckers are hard working people who deserve to be paid for their services Kingston and GHK included. There are numerous companies whore accepts trust monies and have failed and/or neglected to discharge their trust obligations.

Just so I'm clear about this please...

Is this the same Kingston that has screwed countless companies and now is going to be suing countless companies again because his factoring company came to its senses?

There are so many threads about Kingston screwing people that I'm so confused. If this is the same Kingston, it goes to show how F***ed up our laws are...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In response to the previous posts about the Kingston and GHK Collections. It is correct that Kingston and GHK's accounts have been assigned to my firm for collection and/or litigation.

For those who are incorrectly listed on either company's accounts receivable, this is your opportunity to resolve this issue once and for all. My firm operates with the confinement of the Rule of Law. Having stated this. I will not pursue any company that does not legitimately owe the companies previously mentioned.

However, I intend to pursue any company who owes Kingston and GHK but refuses to tender payment. I am a proponent of the fact that truckers are hard working people who deserve to be paid for their services Kingston and GHK included. There are numerous companies who accept trust monies and have failed and/or neglected to discharge their trust obligations.



And when you collect all this money that is owed to KINGSTON and GHK and any other scumball companies owned or operated by slimeball TONY are you going to do the proper thing and turn this collected money over to the court system for distribution to its rightful owners.
Which are

ALL THE HARDWORKING TRUCKERS THAT TONY SCREWED!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Court against Ghk

I've been in court for settlement hearing on Jan23/2012. The resault is my claim was withdrawn againt Antonio Goinfriddo personally. The Ghk part is ok. That means in real situation it's not that easy to pierce corporate veil. If you need any additional info please email me at sokil_trucking@rogers.com
 
Just Received a letter from George Brown, Trying to Collect on a PAID invoice from November 11, 2010. On Behalf of GHK/Kingston Transport.

Very interesting that they are going after paid debt and seem to be in desperate need of money to take on this account.

Blondie what facts are we to get straight?

INVOICE PROVIDED BY GHK C/O RBA.
 
What I am not getting is who protects us who have had to pay twice? -- Once to Tony and a second time to the rightful carrier that did the load. I am all for paying the hard working carrier but not for paying the person who uses fraud to get business. Our industry is tough enough to work in let alone people doing this. To take a hit to the tune of $6000 twice is a hard pill to swallow.. so again who protects us that have to pay twice because of low life like this who haunt our industry!! When and how does it stop?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Champion you protect yourself through due diligence. Getting references etc..Get truck and trailer numbers for your loads. Inform the shipper to call when the truck arrives at your pick and inform you what name is on the truck. Go the extra mile it's cheaper in the long run.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Champion let him take you to court. There is enough of us that would go along as witnesses to his game and as long as you can prove you paid the carrier that did the work I really don't think the judge would make you pay him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lowmiler I think Champion was saying first he paid Tony for the load and later he again paid the carrier who did the actual work.
 
Sometimes best when there appears to be a discrepancy as to who is legally owed funds, to simply put the funds into court. Let the judge decide?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hold On Michael K

Champion you protect yourself through due diligence. getting references etc..Get truck and trailer numbers for your loads. Inform the shipper to call when the truck arrives at your pick and inform you what name is on the truck. Go the extra mile it's cheaper in the long run.

Before you assume that one is not taking their part with due diligence ask first; Unethical & unconscionable person(s) as Tony, who continues to steal the identity of other company's (which you know today is a huge issue in our industry). Therefore, one can do all the due diligence to protect themselves and still get screwed. I guess no different then many of the postings on this site about how many are trying to collect from either a broker, carrier or actual shipper....due diligence can be first priority, but at the end of the day.....I say no more.
 
This industry attracts some real unsavory characters and if you have done everything to protect yourself and still got screwed, than you did your job. However, if the load was given to Kingston and it was double brokered ( as most were) than the situation could have been avoided by simply asking the shipper the name on the truck before anything gets loaded.
 
well lots of things to ponder but yes I did do my diligence and unfortunately that got me no where.. as we all know when someone has covered all the basis then you are left holding the bag. I did pay RBA/Tony and then I had to pay the carrier that did the load as they took the route of least resistence and required that I pay or they would go to my customer.

I have fully investigated the situation and involved the police, however, there is no protection for my company -- I get that there are people out there that want to push the limit of our industry and take what they can get and run but this person just keeps coming back and we keep letting him... that puzzles me!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tony called today offering freight

Tony was offering a flatbed load from Chambersburg, PA to Toronto for a flatbed. Thanks to this site I was well aware of his antics and steered away. Beware he is still active.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kingston

Tony was offering a flatbed load from Chambersburg, Pa to Toronto,for a flatbed. Thanks to this site I was well aware of his antick's and steered away. Beware he is still active.

Can you let us know which company he is now representing? He has a history of frauding his documents from other companies - specific to the "champion" posting.....
 
Last edited by a moderator: