Currency Exchange US Dollar

Pablo

Site Supporter
10
How are people dealing with the continued and steady drop in the US dollar?

I'm pretty good on the pricing side with currency surcharges and dealing with raising rates as the exchange rate drops. However, my biggest problem is that I have a million bucks in receivables and when the customer pays 30-60 days later in USD it's worth 2-3% less. That's big bucks!

Is anyone using forward exchange rate contracts or any other financial instruments to minimize the impact of this problem?

Looking for some advice.
 
Our view of currency surcharges is that you are going to pay for this later. Once the US dollar comes back, AND IT WILL, you can bet your sweet bippy that the Americans will remember the currency surcharges you are claiming you need now.

You/we had no problem being paid in US dollars when you/we were making an extra 25 - 40 points a while back so, when they start telling you that they will be paying you in CD $ or reducing the rates for the US currency value when they are back in a positive position, then all you currency surcharge guys will be on here whinning about the bad US guys trying to screw you.

You are screwing it up for all the guys that enjoyed making an extra 25 - 40 points...
 
If you are going to introduce a exchange surcharge then you need to set a base line and when or if the US dollar gains your surcharge will decrease instead of increasing your rate. If in brokerage and have seen people complaining about it on here lately if you bill in US pay your carriers in US, but you can't flip back and forth if you want any credibility.
 
Clarification

Thanks for the input guys. I already have a USD currency surcharge in place and it works well for freight I'm moving in the FUTURE. For example if customer is paying $1000 USD and the value of the USD drops by 2% the sucharge kicks in and adds 2%. I have no problem crediting the 2% either if the USD is worth 2% more. That's exactly how it works.

My problem is with the loads I moved 60 days ago and am just now getting paid for. The dollars that we contracted to move the load for are worth less 60 days later. Over a large USD receivable, this is a huge problem.

I'm in business, I want predictability, not a lottery hoping for it to go the other way and have big pick up. If I wanted that kind of risk, I'd go to the horse races!

Does anyone actively hedge their USD receivables? If so, what's the strategy?
 
Pablo, we too have approx. 20% of our receivables billed in US funds, and the last 12 months have been troublesome. It has been something I was considering and was interested to see comments from others that have adopted such a strategy. Let's hope one of the members will share their experience.
 
Here, if we bill US funds we pay US funds. If we bill CAD, we pay CAD.

But in the past, we would buy USD futures from the bank ... and what that means that you commit to exchanging a certain amount during a certain month ... and you can do it 3 months in advance anyway, maybe more.

On the spot, sometimes you'll be on the upside, sometimes not ... it's pretty similar to whether to take a variable mortgage or fixed.

Best thing really is to reign in your receivables so you're not so far out when it does happen ...
 
We have been in business for a 22 years and this is the first year that we have not made money on our exchange I agree with Manitoba Moose this will pass as the US economy get's going.....so 1 in 22 years isn't too bad.
 
Still an issue.

Here, if we bill US funds we pay US funds. If we bill CAD, we pay CAD.

But in the past, we would buy USD futures from the bank ... and what that means that you commit to exchanging a certain amount during a certain month ... and you can do it 3 months in advance anyway, maybe more.

On the spot, sometimes you'll be on the upside, sometimes not ... it's pretty similar to whether to take a variable mortgage or fixed.

Best thing really is to reign in your receivables so you're not so far out when it does happen ...

It's still an issue for you because you still have to re value your USD receivables and USD payables. You are right there will be some off set becase you have both costs in USD, but you report in CAN on your financial statements you will still feel the pain.
 
I agree with theman, in that the easiest way to minimize the negative impact of a declining value for US currency, as well as improving your cash flow, is to run a very tight ship with regard to receivables. If you tolerate 60 day or longer payments, then your risk of trading losses increases appreciably. We are very reluctant to negotiate an exchange rate compensation system with our US customers, concurrent with soaring fuel surcharges. Exchange rates are but one issue of many in operating a business, and even with the decline in value of the US dollar, I'm still getting a far better ROI than any alternatives that I've seen.
 
I guess what we are trying to say is there are a ton of ways to balance the deficit of the lowered US $. But telling all US customers that their $ isn't worth what it was and then telling them that you will be charging them a fee for having a devalued dollar is wrong in so many ways.

If you want to play the stock market, then do that. If you want to be in transportation, then do that. But don't do both... It will come back to bite you (and everyone else) in the butt. Because of you guys going around with "currency surcharges", all transport companies will be feeling it WHEN the US dollar regains it strength.

US customers will be using your currency adjustment arguments against all transport companies and, at the end of the day, you are now taking money out of OUR pockets and out of all transport companies pockets by playing stock market with rates.

What are you going to tell everyone when the US dollar gets back to let's say $1.20 CD? And your US customer that you had been playing stock market with, comes back and tells you that your rate is now being cut by 20 points - because his dollar is now worth a lot more...

Adjust your rates to compensate the devalued US dollar... Absolutely... Call it a "I've gotta buy a new Porsche" surcharge or call it whatever but DO NOT CALL IT "currency surcharges".

Again, this is trucking and if you want to play stock market, do that and stay away from transportation. You're screwing everyone with this way of thinking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just read on CTV news that the Cdn. dollar is dropping in value as investors (read speculators), began selling off commodities. It's long been my opinion that large currency speculators, just like speculators in other commodities, respond to their emotions rather than knowledge and intellect, when making their trading decisions. You know they will drive up the cost of coffee if there may be a hint frost in Brazil, never mind the realities. This is why it's not in my long term interests to charge my US customers a currency value surcharge - nothing stays the same for very long. Besides, this uncertainty allows me the opportunity to exercise my intellect and creativity in coping with the variables that we always experience, and I'm never bored.
 
Manitoba Moose is actually right on. I don't like the idea of currency surcharges ... it's better to just adjust rates when you have to based on the bottom line.

With the fluctuation in currency, there is a fluctuation in trade balance so a straight exchange surcharge is not a perfect science (and neither is FSC).

As long as you are market correct, the method of how you get there is irrelevant. That said, margins are much skinnier for us brokers than they were when there was such an exchange upside, but most have already revised their business models to reflect the realities.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Currency surcharge really isn't anything new. Several common carriers especially in the ltl and package sector have had this in place for a few years.

I remember years ago when it was only the larger type companies that were implementing a fuel surcharge and there were several clients that refused to pay it. Now it is a standard procedure. The same will happen with the currency surcharge and I wouldn't be surprised if someone like the NMFC starts a weekly schedule for that. Along with FSC, the CSC will be necessary in order to remain profitable.
 
Quote it in Canadian funds with the understanding they can pay in either currency but at the time of check remittance you will work out their exchange rate. You have to do that today with the volitility of our currency
 
Is anyone using forward exchange rate contracts or any other financial instruments to minimize the impact of this problem?

Looking for some advice.

Of course currency futures are available but I have found that there is not enough spread to make the risk worth it. Here is the basic idea - big carriers and the railways do the same with fuel by buying heating oil futures.
You get a stock broker to purchase a contract on the dollar. The lenth of time is for you to choose. (Of course, you have to put out the money now and pay any brokerage fees) The idea is that if you know that your customer will pay in 60 days you will take a 2 month contract. The idea is that if the US dollar sinks, your contract that you bought at todays date will offset any losses on the currency exchange in 2 months. If the US dollar goes up, your money in the bank will be worth more but you will receive less from the sale of your contract.
In the end what it does for you is solidify the price you are getting for your dollar at todays rate. You will not win nor lose but you can sleep better knowing that. Is it worth tying up your money and paying out brokerage fees? I don't think so. As of right now, you can buy a 1 year contract (March 2012) for 1.018 in comparison to 1.025 for the current month. If the dollar goes to 1.15 by next year it may have been worth it to lock it in but if it goes the other way and the US$ is worth more than Canadian you have locked all your money in at 1.018 and when others are reaping a better US$ you have to live with the decision you made.

The same thing goes for fuel but it really is a dangerous thing because if the broker doesn't sell the fuel before the end of the contract you are contractually required to take delivery of the fuel. What would you do with a tanker full of fuel? When the barrel of oil went to 140 last year, those people who bought it at price lost the difference when they sold the contract. Lets say they bought a contract of 5000 barrels of oil at $140 (hoping it would go to 200 like they said it would), they would have paid 700K and when they sold it maybe a month later at $50 the would have received 250k for a net loss of 450K plus brokerage fees. (OUCH).
Now if you would have entered into a contract with a large shipper and you were guaranteed payment at a certain rate, you may have thought this was a good idea to hedge (protect) yourself against a higher fuel price. In this case, you might make up the 450K in paying less for fuel at the pump making your net loss at zero.

Both CN and CP bought millions of dollars with of futures in heating oil back in 2004 and from what I understand they are still reaping the benefits. Yes, they pay at the pump the same price as we do but they "locked" in their price at 2004 levels so for every contract they sell, they make the difference. They sell the same amount of fuel as they use each month.

In the end, it only helps if your crystal ball is working right or you have tons of money to invest. It isn't for the faint of heart.

I hope it is clear as mud now.