G Force Logistics

Do you mean this company? Not authorized for FMCSA? With an application date of Mar 13, 2026 - not even 60 days? Who has the same business street address as Truck World MCI? Whose domain address is only 69 days old?

Are you really going to think that anyone on this site has used this new company, (which has only one truck), and be able to give any confident information about this company?

TBH...all your posts lately are exactly the same - looking for information about a new company. It is your schtick now but why?

1778537556872.png
1778537705231.png
 
Do you mean this company? Not authorized for FMCSA? With an application date of Mar 13, 2026 - not even 60 days? Who has the same business street address as Truck World MCI? Whose domain address is only 69 days old?

Are you really going to think that anyone on this site has used this new company, (which has only one truck), and be able to give any confident information about this company?

TBH...all your posts lately are exactly the same - looking for information about a new company. It is your schtick now but why?

View attachment 3799
View attachment 3800
Hi Jim, thanks. Asking the question to validate concerns and flag people that appear out of nowhere for the benefit of others who might have the same question. They've emailed a few times but never felt comfortable.
 
Hi Jim, thanks. Asking the question to validate concerns and flag people that appear out of nowhere for the benefit of others who might have the same question. They've emailed a few times but never felt comfortable.
I owe you an apology, I'm very sorry that my post came at you like a bit of an attack. I see your posts often and all of them usually have very little back info and the companies in question have little information. Whatever is to be found shows the company to be fairly new and have conflicting data point screaming out that they should not be trusted. I thought that you were using these companies and was looking for quick information from Inside Transport instead of doing your own investigation. Once again, I apologize for my previous post - it was uncalled for.

TLDR:
I have nothing against a new company - everyone should be given the chance, but I find that most new companies that make it to this website have been proven to start with information that should have stopped them dead in their tracks. I feel that most times this is done on purpose to give the bare minimum, but when push comes to shove nobody can do anything about it. I'm jaded because these carriers have no business in the market, they drive prices down, their model only works by skirting laws, and in the end, I have to answer to a broker who tells me my price is too high because this guy can do it cheaper. Brokers used to be the gate keepers to entry into this industry. They'd ensure that all the carrier information lined up or they wouldn't use you. Now brokers don't even look, if the price fits, then book it - deal with it later.
<END RANT NOW>
 
I owe you an apology, I'm very sorry that my post came at you like a bit of an attack. I see your posts often and all of them usually have very little back info and the companies in question have little information. Whatever is to be found shows the company to be fairly new and have conflicting data point screaming out that they should not be trusted. I thought that you were using these companies and was looking for quick information from Inside Transport instead of doing your own investigation. Once again, I apologize for my previous post - it was uncalled for.

TLDR:
I have nothing against a new company - everyone should be given the chance, but I find that most new companies that make it to this website have been proven to start with information that should have stopped them dead in their tracks. I feel that most times this is done on purpose to give the bare minimum, but when push comes to shove nobody can do anything about it. I'm jaded because these carriers have no business in the market, they drive prices down, their model only works by skirting laws, and in the end, I have to answer to a broker who tells me my price is too high because this guy can do it cheaper. Brokers used to be the gate keepers to entry into this industry. They'd ensure that all the carrier information lined up or they wouldn't use you. Now brokers don't even look, if the price fits, then book it - deal with it later.
<END RANT NOW>
Thanks Jim. We always do investigation first but sometimes, especially for domestic carriers, information is sparse and Google reviews are really only a small sample of what the public thinks (or former disgruntled employees and clients). Agreed that early stage companies are usually too small to be truly reliable or too sketchy to be initially trusted but this is a great forum to see the experiences of others. We've had complete unknowns come out of nowhere and do a super job but then have communications meltdowns later. In short: great at getting the work and executing, terrible at follow ups. Just a part of the due diligence and dealing with uncertainty.
 
I owe you an apology, I'm very sorry that my post came at you like a bit of an attack. I see your posts often and all of them usually have very little back info and the companies in question have little information. Whatever is to be found shows the company to be fairly new and have conflicting data point screaming out that they should not be trusted. I thought that you were using these companies and was looking for quick information from Inside Transport instead of doing your own investigation. Once again, I apologize for my previous post - it was uncalled for.

TLDR:
I have nothing against a new company - everyone should be given the chance, but I find that most new companies that make it to this website have been proven to start with information that should have stopped them dead in their tracks. I feel that most times this is done on purpose to give the bare minimum, but when push comes to shove nobody can do anything about it. I'm jaded because these carriers have no business in the market, they drive prices down, their model only works by skirting laws, and in the end, I have to answer to a broker who tells me my price is too high because this guy can do it cheaper. Brokers used to be the gate keepers to entry into this industry. They'd ensure that all the carrier information lined up or they wouldn't use you. Now brokers don't even look, if the price fits, then book it - deal with it later.
<END RANT NOW>
For the most part, I agree wholeheartedly with Jim’s assessment of the brokers role in our industry and sadly, the deteriorating state of that role. However, I do believe that using Inside Transport reports to determine how all freight brokers operate, can be somewhat misleading. Similar to Trip Advisor, the majority of reports will be negative, as most people are much more inclined to log in and file a report when they’re pissed off, as opposed to satisfied. This skews the reports in one direction and taints the overall perception of the industry. As an example, lately our firm has been placed in the position of using a “new” or “unknown to us” carrier. Let me state unequivocally, that this is not driven by rates as opposed to simple availability. For the most part, the transactions have been completed without incident. Perhaps going forward, we should be posting positive reports about these carriers in order to help “balance” things.