You cannot control Immigration; it's a natural process, as I said above. What you can do is enforce strict laws and rules to maintain the integrity of civilised societies living in this part of the world. Look at the UAE, they welcome everyone, but with conditions.The other expression is "pull up the draw bridge". Meaning of course that once you make it inside the castle, close the door so no one else can come in. The problem lies with a lack of enforcement of existing rules.
The UAE is not democratically run though. In our democracy there's some parties that benefit more than others from the open border policies. The idea is that the party that let these immigrants in will in turn return the favour by voting for their party in future election cycles.You cannot control Immigration; it's a natural process, as I said above. What you can do is enforce strict laws and rules to maintain the integrity of civilised societies living in this part of the world. Look at the UAE, they welcome everyone, but with conditions.
I doubt that this idea is true. If it was, why are most of the MPs and MPPs in the Brampton/Caledon area, and other ridings with a high number of new immigrants from India, predominately Conservative? Many immigrants, after building some equity and wealth here in Canada, tend to gravitate to the Conservative, thinking that they will best protect their interests.The UAE is not democratically run though. In our democracy there's some parties that benefit more than others from the open border policies. The idea is that the party that let these immigrants in will in turn return the favour by voting for their party in future election cycles.
Not quite sure what role the United Nations has in people wanting to move to another country. Immigration is as old as humanity. People have always been on the move, usually to find better lives for themselves and their families. War, famine, drought and other man made and natural disasters also drives people to leave their homes. If the UN was funding these countries with”large amounts of money”, why would people want to leave them?You cannot control immigration as long as you are part of the UN. UN funds these countries in large amounts, which cannot be ignored.
The problem is that Immigration has become the source of free income for Canadians. The primary purpose of immigration is to provide a workforce to meet the demand and drive growth for the nation. It can only happen when the number of people coming in matches the qualifications needed. Can you imagine classes being held in a Cineplex because the College didn't have enough rooms?The UAE is not democratically run though. In our democracy there's some parties that benefit more than others from the open border policies. The idea is that the party that let these immigrants in will in turn return the favour by voting for their party in future election cycles.
There is a quota that the country must meet, requiring it to accept X number of immigrants from low-income countries in the form of refugees to receive funding. The UN pays a certain amount, and a country spends maybe a quarter of it, with the rest kept for personal expenses. There is a whole documentary on Ukraine funding.Not quite sure what role the United Nations has in people wanting to move to another country. Immigration is as old as humanity. People have always been on the move, usually to find better lives for themselves and their families. War, famine, drought and other man made and natural disasters also drives people to leave their homes. If the UN was funding these countries with”large amounts of money”, why would people want to leave them?
I'm referring to the election results, if you look at this year's it was predominantly liberal in Brampton/Mississauga ridings where a high number of new immigrants will reside. Out of the 5 ridings in Brampton only 1 of them voted conservative, the rest were red. This strategy has been effective in the US as well in states like California, they haven't voted republican since the 80s and their immigration policies play a big role in that.I doubt that this idea is true. If it was, why are most of the MPs and MPPs in the Brampton/Caledon area, and other ridings with a high number of new immigrants from India, predominately Conservative? Many immigrants, after building some equity and wealth here in Canada, tend to gravitate to the Conservative, thinking that they will best protect their interests.
A little diversity wouldn't hurt either.It can only happen when the number of people coming in matches the qualifications needed.
Actually, that’s not quite correct. The UN does not dictate immigration policy to any country nor does it directly pay countries to accept immigrants. They do provide financial help to countries who have decided to accept immigrants in the form of assistance in housing and settlement. There are many sources of dubious or outright incorrect information circulating on the internet. Caution is highly recommended.There is a quota that the country must meet, requiring it to accept X number of immigrants from low-income countries in the form of refugees to receive funding. The UN pays a certain amount, and a country spends maybe a quarter of it, with the rest kept for personal expenses. There is a whole documentary on Ukraine funding.
Housing and settlement needs funding, which is provided in abundance by the UN. I know hotels were booked for a year in advance at the rate of $10k per room during the Ukraine war. I understand there is no direct transfer of money, but surely via policies. The USA is pulling the plug and doesn't want to be on the list because Immigration is not what they need; in fact, they need just temporary workers. In comparison, Canada needs permanent immigrants because of the Baby Boomers.Actually, that’s not quite correct. The UN does not dictate immigration policy to any country nor does it directly pay countries to accept immigrants. They do provide financial help to countries who have decided to accept immigrants in the form of assistance in housing and settlement. There are many sources of dubious or outright incorrect information circulating on the internet. Caution is highly recommended.