Driver Inc ... A Last Word

@Capner.. It is my strong understanding, once you are NOT on payroll, you don't have coverage through the company you are working for and must produce a proof of 3-d party coverage..
The success of those O/O's winning judgement based on a lack of their company's paperwork process while signing them on board..
But, may be I don't know something?
Igor still eager to learn, eh...
I agree....always learning. The day we stop learning...we're screwed...and not in a good way...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Igor Galanter
See below
  • TFI annual income taxes for 2022 were $0.242B
  • TFI annual income taxes for 2021 were $0.152B
  • TFI annual income taxes for 2020 were $0.087B
  • TFI annual revenue for 2022 was $8.812B
  • TFI annual revenue for 2021 was $7.22B
  • TFI annual revenue for 2020 was $3.781B

What's the issue?
It's not fraud or taxes - as we saw TTC had hundreds of employees defrauding the local union and contributing taxpayers - this is endemic across all government services.
As a small player, I can definitely say my tax % is higher than this.

So what is it?
Is it your understanding of
Meritocracy?

A level playing field?

The largest player in the Canadian market grew by (6,182.98%) in the last two decades. Where is the level playing field?



Also; I worked with both Driver Inc & company drivers in a large variety of settings. Out of a sample size of approximately 130 individuals of all creeds and backgrounds, those who organized themselves and took responsibility and pride in their work were usually Drivers. Inc. When confronted with a difficult day company drivers more than often displayed less initiative and resourcefulness/problem-solving than their contemporary counterparts.

When looking at globalization it's always fun to see one side of the sword - but we forget that when we export our manufacturing abroad we import productivity standards. Sometimes we smile at readily available produce and product but are in shock when we find out LMIA drivers (2023) delivering NB potatoes into Brooklyn Whole Foods get 32 cents a mile as a company driver.
 
Last edited:
Is this a common practice I guess to contract lanes at lower rates then hire LMIA drivers and pay them half the working driver rate to compensate loss of income?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JACKBURTON
Ah the good old days of 2022
 
You save a lot not paying payroll tax or WSIB or EI etc etc etc.

I remember hearing alot of this going on back around 10 years ago. Here is Muirs getting rid of their drivers to go O/O only. Is this not the origins of Driver Inc model? Make all your employees owner operators or your fired!
 

I remember hearing alot of this going on back around 10 years ago. Here is Muirs getting rid of their drivers to go O/O only. Is this not the origins of Driver Inc model? Make all your employees owner operators or your fired!
now we know who to talk to once we get the time machine all setup
 
Last edited:
I think we need to take the term "Driver" from this. It is now "Incorporated Workers". This is and will spread to all segments of business. If an employer decides to pursue the Incorporated worker model, I believe the government expects the employer to issue a T4A. This will identify to CRA that moneys were paid. If they don't....well.

I'd like to hear someone's thoughts with respect to the impact on Insurance.

At present, if an Owner Operator has an accident, is injured, and they haven't personally opted into WSIB, or have 3rd party injury coverage, they can pursue the vehicle insurer for medical costs. We all know how costly that can be when you're not insured.

Thoughts?
I have also heard of this model being used for nurses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AA123
Dental hygienists work in a similar model. They are required to incorporate for most offices. I have heard very few pay on payroll
 
The question was, if an incorporated driver is injured physically in an accident. Can they go back your auto policy and claim medical expenses. There any many cases where O/O's have been successful doing this. I can't see the fleet insurer subjecting themselves to these type of claims.

Just my thought.
The correct answer is "Yes, they can.".
The way around it is to make sure your contracted driver has has a motor vehicle in their name, and has his/her own automobile policy. Since they are an independent contractor automobile benefits will come from their own policy first.
However, if the independent contractor does not have their own automobile policy, then they will certainly be able to access the carrier's accident benefits portion of the carrier's policy.
 
The correct answer is "Yes, they can.".
The way around it is to make sure your contracted driver has has a motor vehicle in their name, and has his/her own automobile policy. Since they are an independent contractor automobile benefits will come from their own policy first.
However, if the independent contractor does not have their own automobile policy, then they will certainly be able to access the carrier's accident benefits portion of the carrier's policy.
I agree and that's how I understand it. I wonder if many small companies have thought of the potential impact when taking the independent operator route.