Hmmm...not sure if that would fly at some of the other Contrans companies. They are hell-bent on making sure each company in the groups shows a profit as Contrans itself has to be accountable to investors and so on. When I was there, the only company in the group that had a revenue stream that couldn't have been constant was a school bus transportation company in eastern Ontario. I think the days of Contrans and Transforce are coming to a close. Remember when the company that was the predecessor to Transforce collapsed back around 2000-2001 or so (I think that's when it was)? It's bound to happen again. I've been waiting for it to happen since '08. Not a question of if, but when. When it happens, the pie will be broken up again. The trouble with companies that do M&A (mergers and acquisitions) is that they speed up the demise of not just your competitors (a good thing) but disrupt the industry in general (a bad thing.) Buying up trucking companies, re-branding them and then closing them up when they don't continue to make a profit at a corporate standard is what Transforce does. Contrans doesn't do any re-branding and what they have done with Brookville and Laidlaw has just confused many. It was definitely not business at "any cost" because all orders that had a loss or were about to take a loss had to be justified - each and every one - to Contrans management.